
Naturally enough, it was fairly easy to find articulate ladies in their 40s who had had mammograms that found cancers in an early stage, and they readily agreed to having interviews, probably for free too.
So now, in addition to us old folks gradually getting more suspicious that our exalted politicians were out to ration us out of existence—how else could they save money on Medicare—now they are arousing the wrath of 40 somethings who would have not discovered their cancers until perhaps it was too late: And worse, it seems very clear that this is an example of another form of rationing that will be inevitable with government medicine. Instead of high mucky-mucks making their pronouncements and then us turning to our local physicians who would advise us whether we should listen to them or not, we will not have that option.
Of course, there is more to it than the simplified argument above but that is not how we conduct our so-called "health-care debates."
2 comments:
The government should have known that their first venture\trial into rationing should never start with breast cancer. I mean start with testi-cancer no one cares about that. The pink pins and flags are everywhere. And yes Ken soon your kids will be able to put you on the canoe and just push you out to sea when its "your time to go". The best part is listening to NPR try and explain this mammogram debacle.
You would think they should have known, but that assumes 1) that they have a good hold on reality, and 2) that our government is a totally top-down organization. Neither of these assumptions are valid.
Isn't this fun. Who knew, when we were growing up that ordinary common sense would be thought subversive, when being normal is not?
Post a Comment